Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> writes: > 1) Can this behaviour, in the case described above, when after dump and > recovery we receive different data, be considered correct?
It's undesirable, for sure.
> 4) Does it make sense to extend the "simple case" grammar so that it can > accept a custom operator?
This has been discussed before, see e.g. [1][2]. Unfortunately CASE
