Re: Postgres 11 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
Subject Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Date
Msg-id CAC8Q8tKbYmNdiyWr7hE4GfMY4fbqHKkFziKgrUuWHH6HJQs3og@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Postgres 11 release notes
List pgsql-hackers
> I'm not sure it is usefull in release notes since it is more about API, and not
> user-facing change. Just in case.
> GiST opclasses now can omit compress and decompress functions. If compress
> function is omited, IndexOnlyScan is enabled for opclass without any extra
> change.
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/
> d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128

Uh, we do have this for SP-GiST:

        Allow SP-GiST indexes to optionally use compression (Teodor Sigaev,
        Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov)

I am unclear how far downt the API stack I should go in documenting
changes like this.

It is also a bit misleading - the idea in that change is that now index representation can be a lossy version of actual data type (a box instead of polygon as a referende, so a changelog entry can tell "Allow SP-GiST index creation for polygon datatype.").  There is no "decompression" for such thing. "compression" sounds like gzip for me in user-facing context.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL prefetch