Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists
Date
Msg-id CABwTF4WWM4N1n6q0QqYjy8ADp2yae6Bb_tUYUOFQawEa0-O2RQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
I did a some performance tests of v5 and v6 version and there v5 is
little bit faster than v6, and v6 has significantly higher stddev

Thanks Pavel.

The difference in average seems negligible, but stddev is interesting because v6 does less work than v5 in common cases and in the test that I had shared.

The current commitfest (2013-06) is marked as 'In Progress', so is it okay to just mark the patch as 'Ready for Committer' or should I move it to the next commitfest (2013-09).

What's the procedure of moving a patch to the next commitfest? Do I make a fresh submission there with a link to current submission, or is the move doable somehow in the application itself.

Best regards,
--
Gurjeet Singh

http://gurjeet.singh.im/

EnterpriseDB Inc.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding optionally commit number in PG_VERSION_STR
Next
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists