Re: Adding optionally commit number in PG_VERSION_STR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Adding optionally commit number in PG_VERSION_STR
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRUeYKxdpPVk2VBxos=b1SBAtuREea7QPyc6mY_uvTz4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding optionally commit number in PG_VERSION_STR  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It happens that I work occasionally on multiple builds based on
>> different stable branches at the same time to check fixes that need to
>> be backpatched, and I tend to easily lose track on which version the
>> build I created is based on (Duh!). There is of course the version
>> number up to the 3rd digit available (for example 9.2.4, 9.3beta2,
>> etc.), but as a developer I think that it would be helpful to include
>> the commit ID in PG_VERSION_STR to get a better reference on exactly
>> what the development build is based on. This could be controlled by an
>> additional flag in ./configure.in called something like
>> --enable-version-commit, of course disabled by default. If enabled,
>> PG_VERSION_STR would be generated with the new information. configure
>> would also return an error when this flag is enabled if git is either
>> not found, or if the repository where configure is not a native git
>> repository.
>
> FYI, we include the output from "git describe --always" in the pgAdmin
> version meta info, which is displayed on the About box along with the
> regular version info. That has proven to be extremely useful in the
> past, particularly during QA where people may be testing snapshot
> builds.
Yes, that's also something tracked for the QA/QE tests at VMware.
Having such an option in core would be a good thing for many people
IMHO instead of using some manual scripting.
--
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pgbench --throttle (submission 7 - with lag measurement)
Next
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists