Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> writes:
>>> I tried to eliminate the 'pending' list, but I don't see a way around it.
>>> We need temporary storage somewhere to store the branches encountered on
>>> the right; in recursion case the call stack was serving that purpose.
>
>> I still think we should fix this in the grammar, rather than introducing
>> complicated logic to try to get rid of the recursion later. For example,
>> as attached.
>
> I went looking for (and found) some additional obsoleted comments, and
> convinced myself that ruleutils.c is okay as-is, and pushed this.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Gurjeet Singh http://gurjeet.singh.im/
EDB www.EnterpriseDB.com
