Re: removal of md5 from example code - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Jon Wolski
Subject Re: removal of md5 from example code
Date
Msg-id CABZG8z866RH733UWbKA-oD5J4XE0kQc-LfBrDV+fF=4U=bAsgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: removal of md5 from example code  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-docs
I think I get it, now.

Is the reason for including the `pass` in the example so that the documentation can demonstrate `citext` along side case-sensitive text?

If so, I struggle to come up with anything more obvious than a password hash for a case where case-sensitive comparison of text is necessary. The only other thing that comes to mind is an external system identifier like a Salesforce object id of a user. That would not be as universally obvious an example of case-sensitivity to all PostgreSQL users..

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 1/17/18 11:14, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The documentation at
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/citext.html shows an example
> using md5 for password hashes. This is generally a bad practice and not
> relevant to the feature documented.
>
> I recommend removing the password column from this example or replacing the
> md5 hash with something more secure (a secure hash algorithm with a salt).

We don't have any other hash functions built in and exposed at the SQL
level.  (Maybe that is a problem.)  Do you have any other ideas how to
rewrite that example?

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: A simple question
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: estudent