Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzzWGFhNQONKA3aHE8YOwmf2EJ7=YxxQ+NhUW0uiiPy0w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 15:08, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/28/2011 08:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 14:38, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/27/2011 11:09 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Brar Piening wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have to admit that it's currently broken (it builds but fails during
>>>>> regression tests becuse it can't connect) when building with Visual
>>>>> Studio
>>>>> 2010 or Windows SDK 7.1 because of commit
>>>>> 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db (Enable compiling with the
>>>>> mingw-w64 32 bit compiler).
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems like VS 2010 has a few of the E... constants in
>>>>> src/include/port/win32.h already defined, but obviously in a way that
>>>>> breaks
>>>>> postgres.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of my missing experience and as I don't have a Mingw64 build
>>>>> environment I don't feel like I could fix that without breaking anythig
>>>>> else.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to add that I'm certainly willing to test suggested fixes or
>>>> patches in my VS 2010 build environment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke VS 2010? Are there
>>> any
>>> compiler warnings?
>>
>> He did post the commit - 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db.
>
>
>
> I realize that. I'm asking him to narrow it down more.

Meh. I can't read. Sorry about that.


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes