Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date
Msg-id 4EFB22D6.9060508@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/28/2011 08:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 14:38, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>>
>> On 12/27/2011 11:09 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
>>> Brar Piening wrote:
>>>> I have to admit that it's currently broken (it builds but fails during
>>>> regression tests becuse it can't connect) when building with Visual Studio
>>>> 2010 or Windows SDK 7.1 because of commit
>>>> 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db (Enable compiling with the
>>>> mingw-w64 32 bit compiler).
>>>>
>>>> It seems like VS 2010 has a few of the E... constants in
>>>> src/include/port/win32.h already defined, but obviously in a way that breaks
>>>> postgres.
>>>>
>>>> Because of my missing experience and as I don't have a Mingw64 build
>>>> environment I don't feel like I could fix that without breaking anythig
>>>> else.
>>>
>>> I'd like to add that I'm certainly willing to test suggested fixes or
>>> patches in my VS 2010 build environment.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke VS 2010? Are there any
>> compiler warnings?
> He did post the commit - 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db.


I realize that. I'm asking him to narrow it down more.


cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches