On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for
>> discussion on which one.
>>
>> The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for
>> new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry
>> doesn't *accept* new projects anymore.
>>
>> The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a
>> step in the deprecation.
>>
>> I'd prefer to apply the second one, but will settle for the first one
>> if people object ;)
>
> Well, I don't object to the documentation change, but I have a problem
> with the fact.
>
> Are there any other places that could be recommended for hosting
> my pgFoundry projects?
> If yes, that should be mentioned in the documentation.
Exiting pgfoundry projects are perfectly safe for now - but *new*
projects are not accepted.
There is a project underway (for a *long* time - it keeps getting
stalled) working on migration paths. Until such paths are available
and documented, existing projects will still be safe on pgfoundry.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
