On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 03:44, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Fujii - the original goal here was to avoid having a unexplained
>> disconnection in the logs. The only way to do this cleanly is to have
>> a disconnection reason passed to the walsender, rather than just a
>> blind signal. Looks like we need to multiplex or other mechanism.
>
> That's an idea. But what about the patch that I proposed before?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-08/msg00816.php
Seems like a good solution to me - I hadn't noticed that patch before
posting my complaint.
I don't think it's a problem if it logs it multiple times when it
happens - I think it's a much bigger problem that it logs it when it
didn't actually do anything.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
