On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 6/27/13 6:34 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Is there a reason why we have set the min allowed value for port to 1,
>> not 1024? Given that you can't actually start postgres with a value of
>> <1024, shoulnd't the entry in pg_settings reference that as well?
>
> Are you thinking of the restriction that you need to be root to use
> ports <1024? That restriction is not necessarily universal. We can let
> the kernel tell us at run time if it doesn't like our port.
Yes, that's the restriction I was talking about. It's just a bit
annoying that if you look at pg_settings.min_value it doesn't actually
tell you the truth. But yeah, I believe Windows actually lets you use
a lower port number, so it'd at least have to be #ifdef'ed for that if
we wanted to change it.
--Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
