Re: Min value for port - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Min value for port
Date
Msg-id 51CC2D33.9030005@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Min value for port  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Min value for port
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/27/13 6:34 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is there a reason why we have set the min allowed value for port to 1,
> not 1024? Given that you can't actually start postgres with a value of
> <1024, shoulnd't the entry in pg_settings reference that as well?

Are you thinking of the restriction that you need to be root to use
ports <1024?  That restriction is not necessarily universal.  We can let
the kernel tell us at run time if it doesn't like our port.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: [9.3 doc fix] ECPG VAR command does not describe the actual specification
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Move unused buffers to freelist