On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or >> back further?
> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although > back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN. I don't > think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.
I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.
Good, that pretty much aligns with what I was thinking.