<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Sep 12, 2012 2:00 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <<a
href="mailto:Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov">Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > Magnus
Hagander wrote:<br /> > > "Kevin Grittner" wrote:<br /> > > Dan Scott wrote:<br /> > >>> I ran
acrossa minor typo while reviewing the full-text search<br /> > >>> documentation. Attached is a patch to
addressthe one usage of<br /> > >>> "lexems" in a sea of "lexemes".<br /> > >><br /> > >>
Appliedto HEAD.<br /> > >><br /> > > No back patch? Seems like a bugfix to me...<br /> ><br /> > I
thoughtthat "minor" changes to the docs were not back-patched.<br /> > Did I misunderstand that or is there an
exceptionfor spelling<br /> > corrections? I'm happy to follow any policy we have, but I guess I'm<br /> > not
clearenough what that is.<br /><p dir="ltr">I don't think there is a well covering policy. I'd treat it like a user
facingmessage in the code, for example. Would you back patch the same thing if it was in an ereport? If so, I'd back
patchit in the docs. It's docs that people are going to be referring to for years to come.. And the effort is close to
zeroto back patch it. If it was more complex, I'd think twice about it. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus
