On 01/07/2016 12:32 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: On 1/7/16 1:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Yeah, we could also get rid of this conversation: "Here's a patch for X, which is on the TODO list" "Oh, we've obsolesced that, that was added to the TODO before we had Y" ... by auto-closing TODO items at a certain age. Even if not auto-closed at least it'd be easy to find old items. Bonus points if we attract some volunteer project managers that will keep tabs of all those kinds of things... /me waves hand.... There are quite a few contributing companies that likely have people that could help out with this in an educated fashion but aren't coders.
On 1/7/16 1:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: Yeah, we could also get rid of this conversation: "Here's a patch for X, which is on the TODO list" "Oh, we've obsolesced that, that was added to the TODO before we had Y" ... by auto-closing TODO items at a certain age. Even if not auto-closed at least it'd be easy to find old items. Bonus points if we attract some volunteer project managers that will keep tabs of all those kinds of things...
Yeah, we could also get rid of this conversation: "Here's a patch for X, which is on the TODO list" "Oh, we've obsolesced that, that was added to the TODO before we had Y" ... by auto-closing TODO items at a certain age.
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
