Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
Date
Msg-id CABUevEx1MXLGwZZheHe1gf3edYrupmS0N+4w1B_VU+c8qtNSWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay  (Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:21 AM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:23:34PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > +     Non-zero values of
> > +     <varname>vacuum_cost_delay</varname> will delay statistics generation.
>
> Now I wonder wheter vacuumdb maybe should have an option to explicitly
> force vacuum_cost_delay to 0 (I don't think it has?)?

That's exactly what I proposed, isn't it? :)


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Next
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: undetected deadlock in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION