Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Banck
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
Date
Msg-id 6560790d.170a0220.a3a77.76f8@mx.google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:23:34PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> +     Non-zero values of
> +     <varname>vacuum_cost_delay</varname> will delay statistics generation.

Now I wonder wheter vacuumdb maybe should have an option to explicitly
force vacuum_cost_delay to 0 (I don't think it has?)?


Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alena Rybakina
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning
Next
From: Alena Rybakina
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning