This seems like a very complicated mechanism of substituting for a very simple patch.
I don't have objection to the patch per se. The point of posting this was just to share other mechanisms that exists. BTW advantage of using debugger scripts is that they also work while inspecting core dumps.
Your LLDB script is about the same number of lines as Ashutosh's patch and only works for people who use LLDB.
Alvaro pointed out that gdb also have similar capabilities.
Plus, once you write it, you've got to enter the Python interpreter to use it and then run three more lines of code that aren't easy to remember.
In contrast, with Ashutosh's proposed patch, you just write:
p bms_to_char(bms_object)
I learnt this yesterday and I am sure there are easier ways to do the same thing. I just don't know. For example, you can also do this:
It's still slightly cumbersome, but better than entering the interpreter.
...and you're done. Now, I grant that his approach bloats the binary and yours does not, but nobody complains about pprint() bloating the binary.
Sure. I wasn't aware of existence of pprint() either and may be that's enough from debugging perspective. When I tried that yesterday, the output went to the logfile instead of coming on the debugger prompt. May be I did something wrong or may be that's not inconvenient for those who use it regularly.
So yeah, no objections to the patch. I was happy to discover what I did and thought of sharing assuming others might find it useful too.
