Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date
Msg-id CABOikdOK5PKDNcyZCH5w-cZYNx0rXxLBvoqwW4gqb8LSCqUq_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:



Yes, it is happening consistently. I ran the make installcheck. Attached the regression.diffs file with the failed test.
I applied the previous warm patch on this commit - e3e66d8a9813d22c2aa027d8f373a96d4d4c1b15


Are you able to reproduce the issue?


Apologies for the delay. I could reproduce this on a different environment. It was a case of uninitialised variable and hence the inconsistent results.

I've updated the patches after fixing the issue. Multiple rounds of regression passes for me without any issue. Please let me know if it works for you.
 
Currently the patch is moved to next CF with "needs review" state.


Thanks,
Pavan 

--
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: background sessions
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash