Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql
Date
Msg-id CABOikdOBLm_2dpy8qz+zuFZBZGz=GJ60=gNd=vS51Lp2NanwNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql
List pgsql-hackers
H i Daniel,

On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 1:09 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2024, at 06:38, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't we need to add install and uninstall rules for the new module, like we did in https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a4c17c86176cfa712f541b81b2a026ae054b275e and  https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7039c7cff6736780c3bbb41a90a6dfea0f581ad2 ?

Thats correct, we should backport those as well.

Thanks for confirming. Attaching patches for PG15 and PG14, but this will need backporting all the way up to PG12.

Thanks,
Pavan 
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we move the resowner field from JitContext to LLVMJitContext?