Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Date
Msg-id 2735446.1719842903@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> because the failed assertion is:
>> #ifndef PG_HAVE_ATOMIC_U64_SIMULATION
>>     AssertPointerAlignment(&currval, 8);
>> #endif

Perhaps this assertion is what is wrong?  If the platform has no
native 8-byte alignment requirement, why do we think that atomics
need it?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle SK_SEARCHNULL and SK_SEARCHNOTNULL in HeapKeyTest
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql