On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: > The other way is to pass old tuple values along with the new tuple values to > amwarminsert, build index tuples and then do a comparison. For duplicate > index tuples, skip WARM inserts.
This is more what I was thinking. But maybe one of the other ideas you wrote here is better; not sure.
Ok. I think I suggested this as one of the ideas upthread, to support hash indexes for example. This might be a good safety-net, but AFAIC what we have today should work since we pretty much construct index tuples in a consistent way before doing a comparison.
