On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The only problem, other than a surprising behavior that you noted,
> that I see with this approach is that we might repeatedly try to
> truncate a relation which in fact does not have anything to truncate.
> The worst thing is we might unnecessarily take an exclusive lock on
> the table.
>
So it seems we tried to fix this issue sometime back
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-12/msg01994.php
But I don't quite understand how the fix would really work.
nonempty_pages would most likely be set at a value lower than relpages
if the last page in the relation is all-visible according to the
visibility map. Did we mean to test (nonempty_pages > 0) there ? But
even that may not work except for the case when there are no dead
tuples in the relation.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
