Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

3 August 2011

• 00:44   Re: pgbench internal contention Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: pgbench internal contention Robert Haas
• 02:30   Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE Robert Haas
• 02:38   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Robert Haas
• 02:47   Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Robert Haas
• 03:12   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Simon Riggs
• 03:41   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Alvaro Herrera
• 03:53   Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE Alvaro Herrera
• 07:11   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Dean Rasheed
• 08:19   Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build Alexander Korotkov
• 08:47   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 08:50   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Florian Pflug
• 09:25   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 09:34   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:06   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 10:40   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:13   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 11:19   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:44   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 12:34   Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662 daveg
• 12:39   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Dimitri Fontaine
• 12:59   Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build Robert Haas
• 13:30   Re: pgbench internal contention Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 14:29   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Kevin Grittner
• 15:18   Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662 Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan
• 15:55   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Robert Haas
• 15:57   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Robert Haas
• 16:10   Re: Incremental checkopints Robert Haas
• 16:14   Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys Robert Haas
• 16:19   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Florian Pflug
• 16:31   Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:34   Re: [GENERAL] Odd VACUUM behavior when it is expected to truncate last empty pages Pavan Deolasee
• 16:56   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Florian Pflug
• 17:01   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Kevin Grittner
• 17:04   Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys Alvaro Herrera
• 17:07   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Robert Haas
• 17:07   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Kevin Grittner
• 17:12   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Alvaro Herrera
• 17:27   Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 Robert Haas
• 17:34   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings David E. Wheeler
• 18:15   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Eisentraut
• 18:17   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Eisentraut
• 18:17   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Alvaro Herrera
• 18:21   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings David E. Wheeler
• 18:21   mosbench revisited Robert Haas
• 18:41   Re: mosbench revisited Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:42   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Dimitri Fontaine
• 18:49   Re: mosbench revisited Tom Lane
• 18:52   Re: WAL logging volume and CREATE TABLE Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
• 19:11   Re: mosbench revisited Robert Haas
• 19:19   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings David E. Wheeler
• 19:33   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Robert Haas
• 19:33   Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: mosbench revisited Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Tom Lane
• 20:10   Re: mosbench revisited Robert Haas
• 20:38   Re: mosbench revisited Tom Lane
• 20:44   Locking end of indexes during VACUUM Simon Riggs
• 21:05   Re: mosbench revisited Robert Haas
• 21:11   Re: [GENERAL] Odd VACUUM behavior when it is expected to truncate last empty pages Pavan Deolasee
• 21:27   Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints Alvaro Herrera
• 21:36   Re: mosbench revisited Tom Lane
• 21:45   Postgres / plpgsql equivalent to python's getattr() ? James Robinson
• 21:57   Re: Locking end of indexes during VACUUM Tom Lane
• 22:05   Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue Jim Nasby
• 22:22   Re: mosbench revisited Jim Nasby
• 22:28   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings daveg
• 22:48   Re: Postgres / plpgsql equivalent to python's getattr() ? Tom Lane
• 22:59   Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings Peter Geoghegan