On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > To put it another way, creating a separate object obfuscates > scanRTEForColumn(), since it's the only client of > updateFuzzyAttrMatchState().
Excuse me. I mean *not* creating a separate object -- having a unified state representation for the entire range-table, rather than having one per RTE and merging them one by one into an overall/final range table object.