On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I think you can call HandleStartupProcInterrupts() here, instead of checking postmaster death.
Oops, sorry for that, I quite mess up with this patch. The WaitLatch()
call should still have WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH so as it can leave earlier,
but yes I agree with your analysis that HandleStartupProcInterrupts()
as this is part of the redo work.
> Did Simon's committed patch solve the problem as expected?
Does not seem so, I'll let Simon comment on this matter...
--
Michael
