Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTc6vDjPB8dmwjZu=SBc2myN8dbCi-4ec1Z+V8PAfWrWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> To be able to do this, the patch modifies the isolation tester so that
>> it recognises wait_event SafeSnapshot.
>
> I'm not going to say that's unacceptable, but it's certainly not beautiful.

Perhaps being able to define in an isolation spec a step called
'wait_event' with a value defined to the wait event to look for would
make more sense?
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!
Next
From: 高增琦
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take