Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZHd8N2wto==EXovoTjZ6rStZ5TPmwbtGErw2dU7=52kg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> To be able to do this, the patch modifies the isolation tester so that
> it recognises wait_event SafeSnapshot.

I'm not going to say that's unacceptable, but it's certainly not beautiful.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE