Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSkqEzTSN5oZ0_9-X5qKOCj3P81XPWW+0B3k9bcqK5bCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It's certainly a bug that the combination of the switches doesn't work,
> and I already fixed it (47211af17a).  My question was more towards
> whether -C is a useful benchmarking option at all.  I cannot imagine
> a situation in which, if someone said "I'm doing only one transaction per
> session, and I have a performance problem", I would not answer "yes,
> and you just explained why".

-1 for removing it. I found myself in need of it just a couple of days
back when testing the GSSAPI encryption patch with a read-only quick
load to test if the patch was robust enough to handle a mountain of
connection attempts.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd system-column handling in postgres_fdw join pushdown patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb: introduce PG_CMD_PRINTF intestead of PG_CMD_PRINTF{1,2,3}