Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYQWDRobXm=ds7XY8+OvD687L30JPGAh6A5_eGzBXaw=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It's certainly a bug that the combination of the switches doesn't work,
>> and I already fixed it (47211af17a).  My question was more towards
>> whether -C is a useful benchmarking option at all.  I cannot imagine
>> a situation in which, if someone said "I'm doing only one transaction per
>> session, and I have a performance problem", I would not answer "yes,
>> and you just explained why".
>
> -1 for removing it. I found myself in need of it just a couple of days
> back when testing the GSSAPI encryption patch with a read-only quick
> load to test if the patch was robust enough to handle a mountain of
> connection attempts.

I've used it, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)