Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSh=8dd=gDrcS_ASecG_et8t2VmgSuPyHf57e2=mpWi+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Users like things that are friendly, and we are most likely going to
> piss them off when using postgres_fdw if they need to list manually
> each parent table from the IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA command.
>
>> However, if we're going to do something about this, I think it should
>> be done soon.  Otherwise, I'm going to advocate for reclassifying this
>> issue from "open item" to "possible area for future development".
>
> I was just waiting for the end of the CF before sending in a patch,
> allocating now some time to look at some patches pending for reviews.

And here is the promised patch to address this open item.
-- 
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning vs. information_schema
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar streamfor backup_label