Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSd9sBrs8VSOttMUcE-jMTyQ6XW7U_Yk-pjyfX-ZEWrtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/17 14:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So, now that the last round of minor releases has happened and that
>> some dust has settled on this patch, shouldn't there be a backpatch?
>> If yes, do you need patches for all branches? This problems goes down
>> to 9.2 anyway as BASE_BACKUP can generate end-of-backup records.
>
> Yes, this could be backpatched now.  It looks like it will need a bit of
> fiddling to get it into all the backbranches.  If you want to give it a
> closer look, go ahead please.

Attached are patches for 9.2~9.6. There are a couple of conflicts
across each version. Particularly in 9.2, I have made the choice to
not rename walsender_ready_to_stop to got_SIGINT as this is used as
well in basebackup.c to make clearer the code. In 9.3~ the use of this
flag is located only within walsender.c.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] execGrouping.c limit on work_mem
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256