On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:25 PM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 24 August 2015 at 14:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> > I have to admit I don't much like it either, originally I had this as an
>> > extra property that was only seen in EXPLAIN VERBOSE.
>>
>> Seems like a reasonable design from here.
>
>
> The attached patch has the format in this way.
>
>>
>> (Note that for non-text output,
>> I'd say the field should come out unconditionally. We only care about
>>
>> abbreviating in text mode.)
>>
>
> If that's the case then why do we not enable verbose for all of the non-text
> outputs?
> It seems strange to start making exceptions on a case-by-case basis.
Moved to CF 2015-09.
--
Michael
