Re: Speedup twophase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSSONOfnSqrQ6VdAHdwYcrxwbE1GM7pCFi=90zZnMDHug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speedup twophase transactions  (Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions  (Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I’m not giving up yet, i’ll write them) I still have in mind several other patches to 2pc handling in
> postgres during this release cycle — logical decoding and partitioned hash instead of
> TwoPhaseState list.
>
> My bet that relative speed of that patches will depend on used filesystem. Like it was with the
> first patch in that mail thread it is totally possible sometimes to hit filesystem limits on file
> creation speed. Otherwise both approaches should be more or less equal, i suppose.

OK. I am marking this patch as returned with feedback then. Looking
forward to seeing the next investigations.. At least this review has
taught us one thing or two.
--
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM's ancillary tasks
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: wal_segment size vs max_wal_size