Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSPf0qkq=DhSO-tAM9++LSA2aEYSVJ3oY_EdUdb=jKi1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I've not read through the thread, but this seems like the wrong approach
> to me. The receiving side should use a correct value, instead of putting
> this complexity on the sender's side.

Yes I agree with that. The current patch gives me a bad feeling to be
honest with the way it does things..
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb failure on Debian sid/mips64el inEventTriggerEndCompleteQuery