Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRcVa2LFo+tZMXZggOYYvBwtdWDFzc10gsCd2Tk82pYMCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Ashutosh,
>
> On 2017/09/04 13:51, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thomas's application to track patches told me that this patch needs
>> rebase. It also required some changes to the code. Here's the updated
>> version. I have squashed those two patches together.
>
> Thanks for the rebased patch.
>
> Would it make sense to post them in a new thread?  When this message
> popped into my inbox in a thread titled "dropping partitioned tables
> without CASCADE", I wondered for a second if there is still something left
> to be done about that. :)

That would be good. We will have to update the thread in commitfest
entry though.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?