Re: Regarding BGworkers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Regarding BGworkers
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSN1mi5bAmz6X-u9h11bbbwBzGDWbnhaW8DCc9P4VH_1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regarding BGworkers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Regarding BGworkers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> maybe_start_bgworker()          in postmaster.c
>   do_start_bgworker()           in postmaster.c
>     StartBackgroundWorker()     in bgworker.c
This formulation is fine, thanks. Instead of maybe_start_bgworker,
what about start_bgworker_if_necessary?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible bug with row_to_json
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs