Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRHW+S1V=W+FeWO3jUZ9-EEDeotAnov8YqS2fjFLfvYGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Now, if VS2015 actually has broken bool-returning V0, the argument for
> keeping it going becomes a lot weaker.  But at this point I suspect
> strongly that that's not what happened but rather we've got a faulty
> bool cast there, which if true is something we need to fix regardless
> of any considerations about V0.  Would someone please try the experiment
> requested upthread?

I just gave it a try. And by using PG_1_BYTE() the tests of
contrib/seg/ are passing.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared memory and processes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co