Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRCTU8zN4FjYQEk2qVHMCw-vDK2i7XrVGZkVGmNs63FtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
As you may have noticed, I committed this (after some more cleanup). Of course, feel free to still review it, and please point out any issues you may find.

This comment on top of XLogRecordAssemble is not adapted as page_writes_omitted does not exist. Perhaps this is a remnant of some older version of the patch?
 * If there are any registered buffers, and a full-page image was not taken
 * of all them, *page_writes_omitted is set to true. This signals that the
 * assembled record is only good for insertion on the assumption that the
 * RedoRecPtr and doPageWrites values were up-to-date.
 */
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anssi Kääriäinen
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: alternative model for handling locking in parallel groups