Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date
Msg-id 546F1106.60802@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/21/2014 09:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com
>> wrote:
>
>> As you may have noticed, I committed this (after some more cleanup). Of
>> course, feel free to still review it, and please point out any issues you
>> may find.
>>
>
> This comment on top of XLogRecordAssemble is not adapted as
> page_writes_omitted does not exist. Perhaps this is a remnant of some older
> version of the patch?
>   * If there are any registered buffers, and a full-page image was not taken
>   * of all them, *page_writes_omitted is set to true. This signals that the
>   * assembled record is only good for insertion on the assumption that the
>   * RedoRecPtr and doPageWrites values were up-to-date.
>   */

Yep, fixed thanks.
- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?