Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqR73MP3iHjx-K7GFoMnwu6Ed4mYryE-OE5gt8T+-UHn3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated version of the patch, which modified Michael's
>>> version of the patch, as I proposed in [1] (see "Other changes:").  I
>>> modified comments for pgfdw_get_result/pgfdw_exec_query also, mainly because
>>> words like "non-blocking mode" there seems confusing (note that we have
>>> PQsetnonbloking).
>>
>> OK, so that is what I sent except that the comments mentioning PG_TRY
>> are moved to their correct places. That's fine for me. Thanks for
>> gathering everything in a single patch and correcting it.
>
> I have committed this patch.  Thanks for working on this.  Sorry for the delay.

Thanks for the push. open_item--;
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add trigonometric functions that work in degrees.
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate