Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZJuEmkZNLXUs1OnEw16H5QgzPEjw=f8GrQ1mUN-o6Rrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Attached is an updated version of the patch, which modified Michael's
>> version of the patch, as I proposed in [1] (see "Other changes:").  I
>> modified comments for pgfdw_get_result/pgfdw_exec_query also, mainly because
>> words like "non-blocking mode" there seems confusing (note that we have
>> PQsetnonbloking).
>
> OK, so that is what I sent except that the comments mentioning PG_TRY
> are moved to their correct places. That's fine for me. Thanks for
> gathering everything in a single patch and correcting it.

I have committed this patch.  Thanks for working on this.  Sorry for the delay.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?
Next
From: Dmitry Ivanov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6