On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> So I propose that RecoverPreparedTransactions grabs exclusive lock at
> the top, and only the bottom part of the loop is done unlocked, which
> AFAICS should be safe. (MarkAsPrepared gained a boolean argument
> indicating that caller already holds lock).
Logically both approaches are really close as with this approach the
additional locked area is when scanning the entries of TwoPhaseState.
But I agree that your suggestion would be safer in the long run. This
looks good to me after a close look.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
