On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:12 AM, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> Probably -bugs (or -general if you are unsure about the buggy-ness) would
> have been a more appropriate list since this is all direct SQL that looks to
> be broken. No use moving it now, though.
On HEAD, REL_10_STABLE or REL9_6_STABLE, say with two users:
=# create role popo1 superuser login;
CREATE ROLE
Time: 9.400 ms
=# create role popo2 login;
CREATE ROLE
And then by creating objects:
=# select current_role;
current_user
--------------
popo1
(1 row)
=# set role popo2;
SET
=> select current_role;
current_user
--------------
popo2
(1 row)
=> create table aa (a int);
CREATE TABLE
=> select current_role;
current_user
--------------
popo2
(1 row)
=> reset role;
RESET
=# select current_role;
current_user
--------------
popo1
(1 row)
Per the information you are giving, I would have seen "popo2" as user
for the last query even after issuing a RESET ROLE. However I do not
see any problems.
> Reporting the version(s) you are running would be helpful.
Indeed.
--
Michael
