Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQT0Gbjo1z=YeKtD86OxR1NH9X4j09jk=+o=rEHNKmWvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> So I now have a refactoring patch ready that I'd like to commit (the attached two patches together), but to be honest, I have no idea why the second patch is so essential to performance.
Thanks. I did some more tests with master, master+patch1, master+patch1+CRC refactoring, but I am not able to see any performance difference with pgbench (--no-vacuum, -t) and the test suite you provided, just some noise that barely changed performance. Note that fd.c uses SYNC_METHOD_FSYNC_WRITETHROUGH, so it is necessary to include xlog.h in it.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Feasibility of supporting bind params for all command types
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE IF NOT EXISTS INDEX