Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ-J30X71Upn=W-118s7gwRz07Rn14OawdGkr6jGptgRw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Compiler warning in costsize.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> (I'm personally not that much in love with PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY,
>>> because it tends to confuse pgindent.)
>>
>> I would be incline to just do that, any other solution I can think of
>> is uglier than that.
>
> Actually, no. Looking at this issue again the warning is triggered
> because the Assert() clause is present in USE_ASSERT_CHECKING. So
> instead of removing PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY, here is a more simple
> patch that fixes the problem. No need to put the variable *rte within
> ifdefs as well.

Bah. This actually fixes nothing. Attached is a different patch that
really addresses the problem, by removing the variable because we
don't want planner_rt_fetch() to run for non-Assert builds.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results intovariables
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM authentication, take three