Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Robert Eckhardt
Subject Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module
Date
Msg-id CAAtBm9X4vaL5Ni3axtn-oxmZ3LDN5M8oNgDWZC9uf5dADs9wkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module  (George Gelashvili <ggelashvili@pivotal.io>)
List pgadmin-hackers


On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Hi

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:24 PM, George Gelashvili
<ggelashvili@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
> We realized that many of the changes we would need to make for supporting
> Greenplum would need to go where there is pg version checking throughout the
> code. This is because unlike PPAS which mostly adds additional features,
> Greenplum is based on postgres 8.3.

Isn't Heikki fixing that for your next release?

The current release is 8.2, we aren't trying to make that work with pgAdmin4. Heikki did a yeomans work and the next release will be based on 8.3. Future releases should be more than one Postgres version at a time but there was a lot of cleanup to do before we could start the Postgres merging. 
 

> It looks like much of the version checking logic is repeated at points where
> the features are differentiated by postgres version.
>
> It might make sense at this point to refactor the way that feature flagging
> is done to be a little bit more unified between server types and postgres
> versions so that we could for example have logic along the lines of:
>
> feature_enablement = FeatureEnablement(postgres_flavor, postgres_version)
>
> #...
>
> if(feature_enablement.check_internal_triggers ):
>   # feature call here
>
> and then in a feature enablement class, reference the various versions and
> flavors of postgres.
>
> Any thoughts on this?

I worry that the list of features would end up being huge - we're not
just talking about basic things like whether DDL triggers are
supported, but the catalog schema (e.g. procpid vs. pid in
pg_stat_activity) and small things like whether a particular GUC can
be set on a tablespace.

Ultimately, you have to do a version check at some point though
(unless you're proposing to do something similar to probing the DOM in
a browser at runtime). Doesn't GP's version string contain additional
info beyond '8.3'? In pgAdmin 3 we had a EdbMinimumVersion(int major,
int minor) function in the connection class that basically did:

return isEdb && BackendMinimumVersion(x, y);

Something like that could check other elements of the GP version number.

Greenplum is about to start leveraging semantic versioning. The version number for the next release will be 5.0.0. 
 

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Driver Module
Next
From: Fahar Abbas
Date:
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reportingstatus back to pgAdmin