Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrbDTKLUr5+CutGAHRMCi5+hDsNmiUdwdTPyHK6nWRQtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 14:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So maybe, rather than hacking up the attribute stuff for
> a bug that might bite us again anyway in future, we ought
> to press walleye's owner to install a more recent compiler.

I think that seems like a better idea.  I had thoughts about
installing a quick for now to give the owner of walleye a bit of time
for the upgrade.  From what I can tell, the latest version of minGW
comes with GCC 9.2 [1]

David

[1] https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/releases/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: About adding a new filed to a struct in primnodes.h