Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvrLBo2CKaCbmuxABSZ_9KTK6TE2v-o03634KieLLD=+zQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 16:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > Does anyone have any objections to d5ee4db0e in its entirety being backpatched?
>
> It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug in the back branches,
> but by the same token it's harmless.

I considered that an extension might use the Slab allocator with a
non-MAXALIGNED chunksize and might run into some troubles during
SlabCheck().

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types