On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 00:35, iulian dragos
<iulian.dragos@databricks.com> wrote:
> I am trying to understand why the query planner insists on using a hash join, and how to make it choose the better
option,which in this case would be a nested loop.
> | -> Index Scan using test_result_module_result_id_idx on test_result (cost=0.57..6911.17
rows=4331width=12) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=14824) |
> | Index Cond: (module_result_id = module_result.id)
|
You might want to check if the pg_stats view reports a realistic
n_distinct value for test_result.module_result_id. If the
pg_class.retuples is correct for that relation then that would
indicate the n_distinct estimate is about 115000. Going by the number
of rows you've mentioned it would appear a more realistic value for
that would be -0.4. which is 0 - 1 / (500000000 / 200000000.0).
However, that's assuming each module_result has a test_result. You
could run a SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT module_result_id) FROM test_result;
to get a better idea.
If ANALYZE is not getting you a good value for n_distinct, then you
can overwrite it. See [1], search for n_distinct.
David
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-altertable.html
